Asrock P67 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock P67 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '18 at 19:05
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 196
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 489
51% 408 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1474) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 185
Parallax 189
114% 171 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 177
Splatting 120
112% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 26 22 23 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 367
Write 317
Mixed 253
SusWrite 31.8
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 34.1
117% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 39.2
DQ Write 99.3
DQ Mixed 52.8
45% 63.8 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56%
Great: 118%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
178GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 96 98 96 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 197
Write 214
Mixed 174
SusWrite 97.5
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 30
99% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 80.2
DQ Mixed 37.3
33% 48 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 107%
Crucial M500 480GB-$84
140GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 209 198 195 187 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.4% Average
Read 186
Write 204
Mixed 188
SusWrite 197
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 22.7
84% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 30.7
29% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
423GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 96 98 96 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 88.7
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 97.6
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 62%
WD WD4500HLHX-01JJPV0 450GB
227GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 120 121 120 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 101
Write 95.3
Mixed 73
SusWrite 120
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme6 - $202

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $681
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback