Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 21.2 2-Core 91.6 37% 59.8 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 144 22% 157 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sanyo(144D 8099) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 364.72 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	5.64% Terrible	Lighting 6.87 Reflection 11.4 Parallax 9.34 6% 9.2 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 11.8 Splatting 0.13 6% 7.98 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 5.64% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD322GI 320GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AR1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 15 16 50 62 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 35.4 Write 49.9 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 38.1 25% 34.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT325U6EFR8C-PB HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F 8GB 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 12.5 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16