Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180427
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateNov 15 '18 at 07:13
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 277
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 823
83% 674 Pts
64-Core 1,120
69% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
PNY(196E 1211) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 198
Parallax 188
144% 187 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 168
Splatting 122
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
803GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 294 296 289 296 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 488
Write 350
Mixed 260
SusWrite 295
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 32.3
113% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 156
165% 276 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 107%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
2TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 465 473 479 483 485 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 488
Mixed 420
SusWrite 469
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 59.8
200% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 127%
Great: 130%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
931GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 391 400 406 409 411 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 373
Write 368
Mixed 351
SusWrite 397
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 30.8
99% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 52.5
DQ Write 47.5
DQ Mixed 49.5
37% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 133%
Intel SSDPEDMD800G4 800GB
285GB free
Firmware: 0171
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1701 1699 1671 1667 1660 1660 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,230
Write 1,676
Mixed 830
SusWrite 1,676
306% 1,353 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 57.8
233% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,065
DQ Write 1,038
DQ Mixed 995
763% 1,033 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 269%
Great: 301%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 15 14 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 117
Write 51.8
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 17
64% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 33%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 15 15 15 14 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 96.2
Write 17.7
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 15.6
40% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 33%
Kingston DataTraveler C10 4GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.5 4.6 5.1 5.1 4.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 4.7
10% 9.12 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
38% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 7%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 30 32 24 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 24.5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 30.4
31% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
109% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17%
Great: 28%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.3
5% 5.65 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 30.7
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 31.7
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 52.4
76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,246
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback