Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G4900-$42 1,971 User benchmarks, average bench 52% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 82.5 1-Core 98 2-Core 183 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 191 24% 185 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 64 57 53 54 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 436 Write 335 Mixed 309 SusWrite 84.1 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 28.5 104% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 93.5 DQ Mixed 106 97% 154 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 82%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 65GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 55 59 59 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 60.3 Write 59.4 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 57.5 43% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 1x4GB 3,708 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.9% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.6 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 6 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	190x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples	127x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	121x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	52x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	35x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $218

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16