HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1850
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130816
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '18 at 23:46
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5400B APU 1,193 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Memory 38.8 1-Core 52.1 2-Core 55.7 31% 48.9 Pts	4-Core 84 8-Core 69.9 11% 76.9 Pts	64-Core 80.2 5% 80.2 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D 4,337 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1850) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	3.13% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 4.12 Parallax 3.38 3% 3.8 fps	MRender 3.81 Gravity 2.93 Splatting 4.22 3% 3.65 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.13% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 230 208 91 90 85 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.5% Poor	Read 128 Write 57.5 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 154 22% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 8.6 26% 8 MB/s	DQ Read 12.9 DQ Write 18 DQ Mixed 13.8 11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 465GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 102 103 103 101 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 88.9 Write 76.4 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 101 60% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB 1,804 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 72GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 29 30 29 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 27.9 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 28.1 36% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
K H H 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 8.7 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 8.3 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 MT Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

CPU
A8-5500B APUAMDBench 48%, 2,596 samples	40x
A4-5300B APUAMDBench 39%, 2,157 samples	14x
A6-5400B APUAMDBench 41%, 1,193 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	27x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	12x
Radeon HD 7540DAMDBench 3%, 4,337 samples	12x

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	6x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBHBench 28%, 88 samples	4x
M 2x4GBSBench 28%, 164 samples	3x
1x4GBHBench 22%, 243 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $25

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16