PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-DELUXE (all builds) |
Memory | 22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180419 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 14 '18 at 17:06 |
Run Duration | 219 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
|
87.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3747) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 500GB-$258
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 263 291 285 287 287 MB/s
|
96.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
226GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 277 303 296 298 296 MB/s
|
112%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
2TB free
Firmware: A580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 149 152 153 153 154 MB/s
|
87.3%
Excellent
|
|||
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
442GB free
Firmware: 6A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 164 167 168 168 166 MB/s
|
94.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 221 215 224 216 223 MB/s
|
127%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
421GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
|
18.6%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 1.5TB
675GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
|
23.5%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
116%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 835x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 462x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 282x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 148x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 142x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 123x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $1,103 |