| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180323 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 14 '18 at 12:29 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 53% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
74% 128 Pts
|
60% 481 Pts
|
34% 558 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.5%
Above average
|
54% 65.6 fps
|
53% 64 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 44 58 1.2 44 40 MB/s
|
57.1%
Above average
|
48% 218 MB/s
|
79% 28.4 MB/s
|
152% 232 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84
324GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 83 85 85 84 83 MB/s
|
24.8%
Poor
|
22% 29.4 MB/s
|
35% 0.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.9%
Very good
|
74% 26.1 GB/s
|
53% 18.6 GB/s
|
58% 69 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,115 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 220x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 142x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 113x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples | 69x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 69x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 55x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $323 |