Asus H110M-E/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160511
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '18 at 04:00
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 86.2 1-Core 121 2-Core 238 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 625 65% 520 Pts	64-Core 635 39% 635 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3730) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.5% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 135 Parallax 114 98% 123 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 122 Splatting 103 90% 111 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ZTSSD-S11-240G-P 240GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM10.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 110 38 3.3 21 46 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 439 Write 288 Mixed 317 SusWrite 56.8 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 28.4 123% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 186 171% 262 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 54GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 391 403 381 223 241 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 452 Write 418 Mixed 353 SusWrite 332 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 95 4K Mixed 54.6 182% 63.5 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 329 248% 332 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 83GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 149 153 156 138 155 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 128 Write 67.4 Mixed 73.1 SusWrite 149 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 1x16GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	40.9% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11.6 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	211x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	186x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	167x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	176x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	167x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	88x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	27x

RAM
CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x16GBGEILBench 73%, 565 samples	56x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	33x
9905678-023.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 4,415 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16