Zoostorm 7910-4364A

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7910-4364A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H81M-K
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '18 at 22:14
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$43 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 166 72% 118 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 270 36% 270 Pts	64-Core 271 17% 271 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.4% Average	Lighting 61 Reflection 65.7 Parallax 58.8 50% 61.8 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 59.1 Splatting 51.8 49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Palit PSP120 SSD 120GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 6.2 42 4.8 105 3.2 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.2% Poor	Read 148 Write 135 Mixed 129 SusWrite 44.8 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 3.1 42% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.3 DQ Write 4.7 DQ Mixed 2.6 6% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 81%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 220GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 119 115 118 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 147 Write 132 Mixed 110 SusWrite 118 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 109%
Hitachi HDT721025SLA380 250GB-$105 2,148 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 27GB free Firmware: A31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 53 52 52 53 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 79.5 Write 75.3 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 52.2 45% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 49%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 25GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 11 12 11 11 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 9.5 Write 8.7 SusWrite 10.9 13% 9.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.3 77% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	61.8% Good	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 19.8 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16