Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9400-$55 3,295 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Memory 73.8 1-Core 36.4 2-Core 70.4 41% 60.2 Pts	4-Core 71.2 8-Core 69.1 9% 70.1 Pts	64-Core 70.9 4% 70.9 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 3,003 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 30E7) 256MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.27 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 0.56 1% 1.51 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2.74 1% 1.64 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 161 125 123 130 127 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.6% Above average	Read 215 Write 221 Mixed 206 SusWrite 135 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 27.4 90% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 125 94% 126 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	18.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.63 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 92.9 43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples	9x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	8x
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	7x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 3,003 samples	42x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $55

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16