| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock B450M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180619 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 13 '18 at 13:04 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | SVK-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.9%
Good
|
68% 121 Pts
|
44% 350 Pts
|
25% 409 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.10.1
|
11.4%
Very poor
|
11% 15.2 fps
|
12% 14 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
261% 1,255 MB/s
|
586% 130 MB/s
| ||
|
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
8% 7.83 MB/s
|
32% 1.47 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.3%
Very good
|
75% 26.3 GB/s
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 8,942 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,916x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,683x |
| Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 605x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 720x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 499x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 473x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $407 |