Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	62.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120110
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '18 at 07:37
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 96.4 1-Core 94.2 2-Core 188 75% 126 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 563 58% 468 Pts	64-Core 694 43% 694 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 8C94) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Lighting 77.6 Reflection 82.2 Parallax 78.1 63% 79.3 fps	MRender 73.2 Gravity 74.8 Splatting 78.2 62% 75.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 47 53 51 52 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.7% Average	Read 211 Write 227 Mixed 205 SusWrite 51 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 29.4 95% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 25.2 DQ Write 82.5 DQ Mixed 37.2 33% 48.3 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 104%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80 4,893 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 215GB free Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 151 151 148 149 151 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.9% Above average	Read 202 Write 225 Mixed 201 SusWrite 149 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 32.3 109% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 32.2 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 40.5 36% 53 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 91%
OCZ SOLID3 120GB 1,720 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 112GB free Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 95 99 99 96 95 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 138 Write 117 Mixed 122 SusWrite 97.5 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 26.1 99% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 28 DQ Write 94.3 DQ Mixed 34.3 34% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 61%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 320GB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 93GB free Firmware: V54OA7EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 48 53 53 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 55.7 Write 52 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 52.1 36% 48.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 40%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 452GB free Firmware: JKAOA20N SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 79 82 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 90.5 Write 92.5 Mixed 49 SusWrite 79.6 57% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 0739 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 77 77 77 79 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 141 Write 120 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 77.3 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 97%
Samsung D3 Station 5TB 431 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 4.5TB free, PID 6126 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 77 76 76 76 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 133 Write 153 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 76.4 146% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 1 428% 4.4 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 11.4 DQ Mixed 1.1 427% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 88%
FANTOM HD204UI 2TB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2TB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 24.5 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 27 34% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	53.3% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 21.1 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 52.4 76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	209x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	48x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	33x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	23x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	65x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16