| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
| Graphics | 18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-HVGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111104 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 07 '16 at 11:14 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
17% 25.4 Pts
|
5% 37.2 Pts
|
3% 53 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
19% 20.6 fps
|
18% 22 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clover CD502HJ 500GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
49.2%
Average
|
51% 69.2 MB/s
|
55% 0.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5471-029.A00LF 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
27.4%
Poor
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
17% 5.97 GB/s
|
16% 258 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-HVGS Builds (Compare 135 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HVGS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 17x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 13x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 11x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |