PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20110322 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 12 '18 at 20:26 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 B55
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
59.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gainward(10B0 1402) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 211 213 214 212 207 MB/s
|
74.7%
Very good
|
|||
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
445GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 105 107 108 108 MB/s
|
70.5%
Very good
|
|||
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
638GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 143 143 146 146 MB/s
|
71%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 21x |
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 15x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 7x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $171 |