Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '18 at 20:04
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 71 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 197 68% 122 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 719 67% 556 Pts	64-Core 1062 66% 1062 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9295) CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Lighting 64.9 Reflection 58.3 Parallax 75.4 53% 66.2 fps	MRender 57.8 Gravity 52 Splatting 73.5 51% 61.1 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 160GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102HD SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 64 65 68 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 248 Write 109 Mixed 132 SusWrite 79.4 31% 142 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 11.1 77% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 91.2 DQ Mixed 85.2 73% 110 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 46%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB 2,637 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 106GB free Firmware: 1.37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 54 56 55 55 55 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 198 Write 71.3 Mixed 92 SusWrite 55.9 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 22.3 91% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 68 DQ Mixed 84 67% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 49%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 64GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 202 124 105 121 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 418 Write 430 Mixed 313 SusWrite 176 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 96.4 4K Mixed 35.3 136% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 179 156% 224 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 107%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 60GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 407 402 357 331 310 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 470 Write 406 Mixed 289 SusWrite 369 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 66.4 4K Mixed 26 101% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 158 128% 187 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 86%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 710GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 448 446 451 437 416 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 456 Mixed 423 SusWrite 441 102% 453 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 52 164% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 305 246% 346 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169 37,519 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	MC Read 37.1 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 32.7 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 32.2 SC Mixed 28 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 99 40% 99 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)