TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Casper EXCALIBUR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER EXCALIBUR
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170615
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 12 '18 at 18:47
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 600
63% 504 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 83.8%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Quanta(152D 1159) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1681
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 31.4
27% 30.1 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 23.4
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 26.3%
 Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT2200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 288 303 293 302 284 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 486
Mixed 415
SusWrite 296
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 54.8
182% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 356
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 111%
 Great: 111%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
452GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 94 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 81.5
Write 87.5
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 92.6
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
146% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 50.3%
 Great: 79%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
569GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 87 87 88 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 90
Write 90.7
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 86.1
107% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 38.4%
 Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 21.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 25
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 76.7%
 Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical EXCALIBUR Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples122x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples43x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples73x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples34x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples24x
SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples64x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples35x
MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 87%, 2,168 samples9x
RAM
CT8G4SFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 70%, 580 samples22x
CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GBCrucialBench 73%, 680 samples21x
CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 73%, 670 samples20x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback