HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8437
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180906
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '18 at 03:51
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Memory 94.5 1-Core 138 2-Core 274 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 846 86% 698 Pts	64-Core 1,140 70% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Lighting 69.3 Reflection 69.1 Parallax 59.3 56% 65.9 fps	MRender 72.3 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 66.4 56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 159 159 160 161 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	182% Outstanding	Read 1,519 Write 734 Mixed 536 SusWrite 167 162% 739 MB/s	4K Read 56.2 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 70.5 241% 83.5 MB/s	DQ Read 883 DQ Write 744 DQ Mixed 692 551% 773 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 317%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 918GB free Firmware: MS2OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 196 190 190 194 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 198 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 192 109% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB 6,220 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 23 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 26.1 72% 25 GB/s	Latency 58.6 68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	1,236x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	717x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	588x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	736x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	357x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	289x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	353x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	172x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	157x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	394x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	219x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	178x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16