Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	62.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING WIFI (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180221
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '18 at 03:39
Run Duration	358 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 83.6 1-Core 119 2-Core 246 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 711 73% 587 Pts	64-Core 713 44% 713 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6267) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Lighting 79.6 Reflection 78.5 Parallax 69.5 65% 75.8 fps	MRender 71.1 Gravity 70.1 Splatting 70.2 58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 359GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1692 741 646 650 652 650 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	292% Outstanding	Read 2,488 Write 2,107 Mixed 1,493 SusWrite 838 386% 1,731 MB/s	4K Read 58.7 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 76 256% 89 MB/s	DQ Read 1,512 DQ Write 1,253 DQ Mixed 1,341 1,016% 1,369 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 292% Great: 340%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$102 9,497 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 931GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 469 478 477 480 478 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 480 Mixed 402 SusWrite 477 104% 459 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 92.2 4K Mixed 48.4 166% 59 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 281 230% 329 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 120%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 168GB free Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 435 283 231 227 240 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 397 Write 432 Mixed 343 SusWrite 310 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 97.1 4K Mixed 38.4 140% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 302 235% 322 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 99%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 3.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 148 148 148 149 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 142 Write 156 Mixed 80 SusWrite 147 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.7 258% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 891GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 194 194 192 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 160 Mixed 84 SusWrite 193 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 114%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 113 125 101 115 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 47.5 Write 77.5 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 109 47% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.6 206% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB 1,852 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 112 113 114 121 118 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 120 Write 92.5 Mixed 72 SusWrite 116 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 91%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0909 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 35 Write 37 Mixed 30 SusWrite 40.9 26% 35.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.7 239% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 87%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB 7,722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 103GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 62 28 26 24 27 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 108 Write 40.3 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 35.4 70% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.4 151% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 37%
NORELSYS 106X 2TB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 136 Write 130 Mixed 32.8 117% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 80%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 76 76 77 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 76.3 Write 73.5 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 75.9 95% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 6,017 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 911GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 112 113 113 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 98.5 Write 112 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 112 122% 90 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 43%
Generic Flash Disk 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 975GB free, PID 7788 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.8 3.4 3.5 2.9 3.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	3.21% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 2.2 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 3.2 6% 5.43 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.21% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB 19,779 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.6% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 10.9 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.1 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING WIFI

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	40x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	39x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	39x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	24x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	21x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	15x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsairBench 83%, 5,673 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $369

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16