Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6400-$99 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 34% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 45.1 1-Core 13.9 2-Core 23 21% 27.3 Pts	4-Core 23.9 8-Core 25.9 3% 24.9 Pts	64-Core 44.4 3% 44.4 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Familia Mobile Intel 45 Express Chipset 906 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Sony(104D 9045) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.37% Terrible	Lighting 0.47 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.47 fps	MRender 0.29 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.65 0% 0.41 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.37% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 89 80 77 88 74 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.1% Very poor	Read 53.1 Write 49.2 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 78.7 13% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 2.2 11% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.74% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1.7 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.74% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16