Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '18 at 19:26
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	69%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Memory 21.9 1-Core 9.6 2-Core 11.7 11% 14.4 Pts	4-Core 37.6 8-Core 29.6 5% 33.6 Pts	64-Core 39.9 2% 39.9 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 04B3) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.821.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.07% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 1.59 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.07% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 334GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 29 48 57 26 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 49.9 Write 45.5 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 38.7 32% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 75%
WD WD1600AVBB-63SYA0 160GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 40GB free Firmware: 00.07H00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 17 20 17 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 41 Write 24.5 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 17.1 20% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 39%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 1,450 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1TB free, PID 231a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 31 36 27 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 22 Write 21.1 Mixed 15.6 SusWrite 29.4 30% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.63 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.2 6% 2.07 GB/s	Latency 307 13% 307 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	94x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	71x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	161x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	118x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16