Asrock X370M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20181005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '18 at 17:58
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 85.2 1-Core 123 2-Core 170 76% 126 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 757 70% 586 Pts	64-Core 1,022 63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.31 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 48% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDTR128GB-3DL 128GB 197 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0616B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 403 418 416 167 30 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 494 Write 414 Mixed 343 SusWrite 310 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 87.2 4K Mixed 15.6 111% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 84.9 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 20 55% 112 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 85%
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000L1 128GB 1,655 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 71GB free Firmware: MAT24L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 128 123 127 120 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 482 Mixed 314 SusWrite 139 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 50.1 173% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 263 198% 264 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 104%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2TB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 128 128 128 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 140 Write 153 Mixed 82.4 SusWrite 128 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3200UA8G 2x8GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 46 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 39.2 123% 43.1 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 42.6 SC Mixed 33.2 97% 34.1 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370M Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	15x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	13x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	8x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	10x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	9x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	5x

SSD
NVMe SSD 250GBNetacBench 197%, 691 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
Smartbuy 120GBSSDBench 66%, 1,828 samples	2x

RAM
Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsair $379Bench 82%, 7,634 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	3x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $634

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16