MSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7596
MotherboardMSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120808
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 11 '18 at 14:49
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 104
52% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 198
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
MSI(1462 2730) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 26.9
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 31.9
22% 29.2 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 34.2
23% 27 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 74 55 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 176
Write 142
Mixed 139
SusWrite 72.6
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 9
70% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 58.7
DQ Mixed 12
18% 31.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 64%
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GB
117GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 86 88 92 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.6% Above average
Read 178
Write 171
Mixed 168
SusWrite 87.6
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 38.2
123% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 70.6
DQ Mixed 44.8
36% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 123%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
274GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 86 88 92 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 97
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 87.6
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
102GB free
Firmware: 8104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 16.1
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 33.5
20% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 42%
Toshiba Ext HDD 500GB
71GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 12 26 8.8 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 26.7
Write 25.8
SusWrite 19.9
30% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-E51(MS-7596) Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-E51(MS-7596)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback