Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H270-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '18 at 12:05
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$76 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 166 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 323 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Palit(1569 1380) 2GB CLim: 1476 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Lighting 24.8 Reflection 19.7 Parallax 23.1 20% 22.5 fps	MRender 29 Gravity 25.2 Splatting 19.4 20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N500 120GB 336 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0330A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 373 374 372 374 53 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 428 Write 365 Mixed 346 SusWrite 321 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 25.3 130% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 39 85% 170 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 60%
BUFFALO USB Flash Disk 16GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 11GB free, PID 023b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 14 13 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 119 Write 15.9 Mixed 28.6 SusWrite 14.3 43% 44.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1 93% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP 2x4GB 2,336 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.7% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 21.4 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	1,363x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	216x
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	213x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	482x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	202x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	186x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	120x
Ultimate SU800 128GBAdata $30Bench 77%, 32,167 samples	64x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	545x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	126x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $3,464

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16