Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 11 '18 at 05:01
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76.8% Very good
1-Core 120
2-Core 223
81% 171 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 590
65% 502 Pts
64-Core 770
52% 770 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$369
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Lighting 314
Reflection 286
Parallax 296
80% 299 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 298
Splatting 231
78% 243 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460A 480GB-$300
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 365 442 373 441 371 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 411
Write 442
Mixed 315
SusWrite 404
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 32.8
120% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 238
197% 283 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 109%
USB 3.0 1TB
69GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 78 78 78 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 134
Write 130
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 76.8
68% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FBD Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 24GB
2400, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
63.1% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 21.7
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 77%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 4,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $137Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $203AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback