PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130204 |
Uptime | 10.9 Days |
Run Date | Nov 10 '18 at 15:02 |
Run Duration | 271 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 257 221 252 226 233 MB/s
|
65.8%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
289GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 893 483 485 484 485 484 MB/s
|
||||
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
166GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 73 73 73 72 MB/s
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
500GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 82 83 87 86 87 MB/s
|
45.5%
Average
|
|||
24GB free, PID 0916
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s
|
7.56%
Terrible
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
849GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 110 108 110 108 MB/s
|
47%
Average
|
|||
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
566GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 79 87 87 88 84 MB/s
|
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 185x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 81x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 70x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 33x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $395 |