Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '18 at 13:40
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 191 69% 122 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 497 51% 412 Pts	64-Core 499 31% 499 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Zotac(19DA 5194) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Lighting 11 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 9.16 9% 11 fps	MRender 15.1 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 14.8 11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA12.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 136 95 97 97 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 451 Write 221 Mixed 331 SusWrite 130 63% 283 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 26.7 102% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 191 169% 251 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 90%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 570GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 118% 523GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 237 230 237 234 239 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 285 Write 215 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 235 151% 207 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 2 386% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 206%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A 2x4GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.8% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 10.4 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	15x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	11x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	4x
840 250GBSamsungBench 77%, 2,100 samples	4x

RAM
M393B5170EH1- 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 40 samples	9x
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	6x
HMT351U7CFR8A 4x4GBHynixBench 89%, 39 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16