Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 105 2-Core 207 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 401 54% 401 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO mSAT 500GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 246 248 248 248 248 MB/s Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	75.8% Very good	Read 259 Write 248 Mixed 247 SusWrite 247 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 41.8 135% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 179 135% 180 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 122%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 16,068 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.5 3.6 4.4 4.3 3.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	2.08% Terrible	Read 5.5 Write 3.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.5 5% 4.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.08% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 2,501 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	53.1% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 17.1 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	20x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	12x
PSD34G160081 2x4GBPatriotBench 48%, 2,742 samples	11x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $520

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16