Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 96 1-Core 57.1 2-Core 99.8 56% 84.3 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 215 24% 189 Pts	64-Core 278 17% 278 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 871GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 146 163 108 100 147 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.4% Average	Read 196 Write 181 Mixed 172 SusWrite 129 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 30.7 96% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 34.2 DQ Write 78.7 DQ Mixed 34.7 33% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 133%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB 635 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.2 3.6 4.2 4 4 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.01% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 3.3 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 4 7% 7.28 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 27% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.01% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.8% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 14.5 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.7 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 53.8 74% 53.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $318

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16