Fujitsu D2618-C1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu D2618-C1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory21.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '18 at 20:13
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 176
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 516
53% 427 Pts
64-Core 1,172
72% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 38
33% 36.6 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 37
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Goodram C50 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 123 123 124 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 129
Write 123
Mixed 102
SusWrite 122
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 11.4
45% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 71.4
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 47.4
44% 66.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Wireless Stick 32GB
23GB free, PID 55a9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 11
Write 10.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 10.7
14% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.4
158% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 12 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 21.1
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $259WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback