Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP35-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090618
Uptime36.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '18 at 17:28
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
48% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 37.7
2-Core 77.2
42% 63.4 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 127
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3033) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 47.5
32% 40.7 fps
MRender 30.5
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 39.3
28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 146 153 156 153 158 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.9% Above average
Read 238
Write 220
Mixed 179
SusWrite 149
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 29.9
90% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 166
132% 185 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
88GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 99 96 96 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 62.5
Write 63
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 97.1
50% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3640323AS 640GB-$134
48GB free
Firmware: SD13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 65 64 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 51.8
Write 14.5
Mixed 34
SusWrite 63.9
30% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 122 126 131 130 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 183
Write 150
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 124
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3640323AS 640GB-$134
510GB free
Firmware: SD13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 57 55 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 51
Write 13.2
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 55.4
28% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 66%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.8 4.3 4.5 5.2 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Read 10
Write 5.8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.3
8% 6.52 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EP35-DS3P Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $281
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback