PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3P (all builds) |
Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090618 |
Uptime | 36.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 09 '18 at 17:28 |
Run Duration | 188 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
48%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3033) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 146 153 156 153 158 MB/s
|
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
88GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 99 96 96 99 MB/s
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST3640323AS 640GB-$134
48GB free
Firmware: SD13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 65 64 64 65 MB/s
|
33.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 122 126 131 130 132 MB/s
|
88%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate ST3640323AS 640GB-$134
510GB free
Firmware: SD13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 57 55 55 56 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.8 4.3 4.5 5.2 5.4 MB/s
|
3.33%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
19.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 6x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 3x |
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 2x |
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $281 |