Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '18 at 23:07
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 130
56% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 320
35% 277 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7990 (CrossFire Disabled)
AMD(1002 0B2A) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 60.2
38% 46.2 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 45.4
Splatting 39
32% 38.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 94 92 76 64 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 331
Write 112
Mixed 203
SusWrite 84.4
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 13.3
68% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 28.1
46% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
17GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 80 79 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 79
Write 80
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 78.9
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
182GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 13 13 11 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.01% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 16.2
Mixed 19
SusWrite 13.5
12% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.01%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $235
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback