PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MSI MS-7673 |
Motherboard | MSI P67A-C43 (MS-7673) (all builds) |
Memory | 8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130109 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Nov 08 '18 at 16:04 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 210 126 74 72 84 MB/s
|
63.5%
Good
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
512GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 75 73 82 80 MB/s
|
35.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 106x |
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 61x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 48x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 29x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 20x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $826 |