Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68-VS3 FX (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111007
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '18 at 13:18
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 81.5 1-Core 59.6 2-Core 98.7 52% 79.9 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 265 30% 234 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Asus(1043 0531) ≥ 4GB; Asus RX560-O4G CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Lighting 27.5 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 39.3 22% 32.3 fps	MRender 30.4 Gravity 27 Splatting 34.1 25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 120GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 57 59 50 61 77 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.3% Very poor	Read 88.1 Write 87.3 Mixed 76.9 SusWrite 54.4 17% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 1.8 24% 8.47 MB/s	DQ Read 18.3 DQ Write 19.5 DQ Mixed 20.8 15% 19.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 43%
Fujitsu MJA2160BH G2 160GB 675 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 71GB free Firmware: 0084 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 26.4 Write 41.1 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 68.7 31% 42.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 40%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 258GB free Firmware: MS1O SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 80 80 83 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 22.2 Write 56.3 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 84 35% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 103%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A 320GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 111GB free Firmware: ES2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.5 4.4 3.4 3.7 4.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Read 3.3 Write 3 Mixed 3.2 SusWrite 4.1 2% 3.4 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 46%
StoreJet Transcend 320GB 727 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 122GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 26.3 Write 21.7 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 26.5 32% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 333, 333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 12.3 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 9.9 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

CPU
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	18x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	15x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	16x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
GP-GSTFS311 120GBGigabyteBench 30%, 201 samples	8x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	3x
99U5471-040.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 2,012 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16