Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V GENE (all builds)
Memory	15.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130514
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '18 at 11:51
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 57.2 2-Core 136 55% 91 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 315 34% 272 Pts	64-Core 429 26% 429 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 2983) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.6% Good	Lighting 75.7 Reflection 81.4 Parallax 79.6 62% 78.9 fps	MRender 78.3 Gravity 71.5 Splatting 66.7 58% 72.2 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80 4,893 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 162 Write 230 Mixed 238 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 24.5 83% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 150 124% 178 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 376GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 4.8 9.9 11 8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 191GB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 104 106 104 105 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 83.7 Write 108 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 101 66% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 029E CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 029E CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 029E CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.4% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.3 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 14.2 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	331x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	187x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	29x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	22x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16