Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '18 at 09:58
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 92.2 2-Core 184 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 448 47% 379 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M 6,357 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1634 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Lighting 19.2 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 22.8 16% 20.1 fps	MRender 22.7 Gravity 23.9 Splatting 19.2 18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GB-$167 1,242 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTTAN101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 332 320 374 236 341 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 468 Write 360 Mixed 413 SusWrite 321 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 34.9 113% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 289 230% 321 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 514GB free Firmware: AX0A4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 103 103 104 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 97.8 Write 91.3 Mixed 34 SusWrite 103 59% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 4x8GB 1,917 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 16.1 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 17.5 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QOSMIO X70-A Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	197x
Core i7-4810MQIntel $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples	4x
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	138x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	61x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	3x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	6x

RAM
M471B1G73CB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 128 samples	21x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,157 samples	17x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16