Asrock FM2A75 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121123
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '18 at 00:11
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 124 58% 93.6 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 216 29% 216 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D 7,665 User benchmarks, average bench 5% ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	6.5% Terrible	Lighting 8.2 Reflection 9.69 Parallax 9.56 7% 9.15 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 8.53 Splatting 8.48 6% 7.31 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.5% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,522 Write 3,020 Mixed 2,783 692% 3,108 MB/s	4K Read 185 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 93.6 455% 127 MB/s	DQ Read 438 DQ Write 357 DQ Mixed 140 175% 312 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 31GB free Firmware: X230 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 290 270 255 229 232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 398 Write 343 Mixed 166 SusWrite 267 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 16.7 76% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 61.7 DQ Mixed 19.4 41% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 99%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 17GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 8.1 7.9 7.6 8.3 8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	6.92% Terrible	Read 27.1 Write 4.2 Mixed 9 SusWrite 8.2 13% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.92% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial ST51264BA1339.16FM 2x4GB 1,344 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.1% Below average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 11.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 11.4 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A75 Pro4 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4 - $128

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	8x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	7x
Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples	4x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	4x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 5,300 samples	2x
F3-17000CL11-4GBSR F3-17000CL9-4GBXM F3-17000CL9-4GBXM F3-17000CL11-4GBSR 16GBUnknownBench 43%, 2 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 9,036 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $405

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16