Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 83% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	92% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180910
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '18 at 19:55
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399 38,086 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 92 1-Core 136 2-Core 232 88% 153 Pts	4-Core 527 8-Core 847 84% 687 Pts	64-Core 1,035 64% 1,035 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% MSI(1462 3680) CLim: 1663 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	92% Outstanding	Lighting 111 Reflection 92.8 Parallax 162 90% 122 fps	MRender 92 Gravity 117 Splatting 133 96% 114 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1140 1672 1694 1626 1625 1629 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	321% Outstanding	Read 2,430 Write 1766 Mixed 877 SusWrite 1,564 370% 1,659 MB/s	4K Read 51.1 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 69.4 240% 86.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,310 DQ Write 1,113 DQ Mixed 1109 859% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 321% Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 1.5TB free Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1716 1836 1816 1815 1750 1690 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	342% Outstanding	Read 2,475 Write 1,832 Mixed 1,134 SusWrite 1,770 403% 1,803 MB/s	4K Read 53.9 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 71.8 246% 87.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,520 DQ Write 1,153 DQ Mixed 1,250 958% 1,307 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 342% Great: 354%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB 2,431 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.7% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 24.6 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 25.5 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	444x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	251x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	225x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	145x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	136x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	104x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	69x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	85x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16