PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1496 |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110609 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 07 '18 at 16:36 |
Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600S-$235
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
67.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 452 451 459 457 457 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400SIntel $70Bench 60%, 10,987 samples | 136x |
Core i5-2500SIntelBench 64%, 3,031 samples | 40x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 28x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 266x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 3x |
Radeon R9 M200XAMDBench 10%, 678 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $98 |