| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP s5-1014 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FOXCONN 2A8C |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110321 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 07 '18 at 12:15 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 52% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
52.3%
Above average
|
44% 65.2 Pts
|
21% 158 Pts
|
10% 159 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
PNY(196E 104A) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
1.85%
Terrible
|
2% 2.24 fps
|
2% 2.17 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 203 210 196 194 195 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
44% 195 MB/s
|
100% 32.6 MB/s
|
32% 43.3 MB/s
|
|
Multiple Card Reader 16GB
14GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 13 14 12 14 14 MB/s
|
7.99%
Terrible
|
15% 12.1 MB/s
|
62% 1.8 MB/s
| |
|
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
446GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 24 25 25 25 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
39% 29.8 MB/s
|
94% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.3%
Poor
|
20% 7 GB/s
|
18% 6.27 GB/s
|
47% 84.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical s5-1014 Builds (Compare 10 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP s5-1014
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium E5800Intel $58Bench 37%, 8,890 samples | 8x |
| Core i7-8700KIntel«Bench 35%, 2 samples | 1x |
| Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 4x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 2x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $58 |