Tarox Workstation M9171CP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemTarox Workstation M9171CP  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3348-B2
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160519
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '18 at 12:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 64.2
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 173
59% 104 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 581
61% 477 Pts
64-Core 589
40% 589 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD FirePro W7100
AMD(1002 030C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 128
Reflection 124
Parallax 161
34% 138 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 111
Splatting 84.8
32% 97.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 32%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$219
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X212
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 443
Write 345
Mixed 274
78% 354 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 27
99% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 114
117% 188 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 113%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 29
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 30.1
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83%
Great: 114%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •   YouTube *NEW* Feedback