Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion x360 Convertible (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8074
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150820
Uptime	34.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '18 at 10:15
Run Duration	1136 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Memory 26.4 1-Core 18.4 2-Core 25.9 16% 23.6 Pts	4-Core 28.5 8-Core 33.1 4% 30.8 Pts	64-Core 37.7 2% 37.7 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 27%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 349GB free (System drive) Firmware: GR2OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 24 27 47 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 13.2 Write 15.2 Mixed 6.2 SusWrite 34.1 12% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB 64,960 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 277 14% 277 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	386x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	332x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	30x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 3,641 samples	31x
SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 2,836 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	26x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	90x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	47x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	31x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16