HP EliteBook 2560p

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 2560p (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 162B
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161007
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '18 at 00:21
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 134 62% 100 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 204 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 162B) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2963 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.46 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.46 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 4.48 3% 2.99 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 94 91 95 95 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 432 Write 382 Mixed 342 SusWrite 134 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 25.4 96% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 315 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 207 187% 284 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 90%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 63GB free Firmware: 0C3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 64 57 54 58 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 430 Write 359 Mixed 316 SusWrite 88.1 66% 298 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 25.6 86% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 97.1 DQ Mixed 107 103% 169 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 82%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 50GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 24 24 24 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 22.4 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 24.8 31% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.5 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 2560p Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2560p

CPU
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	118x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	97x
Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples	92x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	340x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	21x
HD Graphics 4000IntelBench 2%, 106 samples	3x

SSD
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	10x
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	125x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	72x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $183

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16