Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 79.3 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 114 54% 85.3 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 189 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.76% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.22 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 1.96 2% 1.79 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.76% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 116 112 112 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 355 Write 135 Mixed 200 SusWrite 116 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 23.8 84% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 123 99% 141 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 82%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46 8,198 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 28GB free Firmware: P22OABEA SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 65 67 67 65 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 73 Write 65.8 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 66.3 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.3% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 8.4 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

SSD
Sata III 128GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,059 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x
Extreme 240GBSanDisk $200Bench 76%, 7,034 samples	1x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $518

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16