Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '18 at 20:00
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 83.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 210 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 660 66% 539 Pts	64-Core 853 53% 853 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 22FF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1224 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Lighting 30.3 Reflection 30.7 Parallax 38 25% 33 fps	MRender 30.6 Gravity 29 Splatting 34.5 26% 31.4 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$31 23,658 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 190 188 188 192 191 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 488 Mixed 227 SusWrite 193 79% 354 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 93.9 4K Mixed 43.3 162% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 270 214% 301 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 105%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 33GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 78 80 79 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 94.3 Mixed 93.7 SusWrite 79 68% 91.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 76%
Seagate IronWolf 1TB (2016)-$57 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 95GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 100 100 100 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 98.9 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 98.7 65% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 98%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 265GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 84 84 85 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 86.1 Write 77.6 Mixed 64 SusWrite 83.8 58% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 72%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54 8,918 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 58GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 61.3 Write 63.1 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 55.5 38% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x8GB 30,532 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.3% Above average	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 16.9 58% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 19.2 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	87x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	80x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	60x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $971

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)