PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP ENVY 15 Notebook PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 198A |
Memory | 7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160719 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 05 '18 at 19:30 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | CHL-User |
Background CPU | 54% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-5750M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
|
38.1%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
HP(103C 198A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.7%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 147 134 143 151 138 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
24.3%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples | 372x |
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples | 269x |
Core i7-5500UIntelBench 46%, 73,655 samples | 222x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples | 603x |
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples | 238x |
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples | 191x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $237 |