Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 03 '18 at 22:28
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 135
57% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 435
42% 343 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Lighting 38
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 45.5
31% 39.2 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 31.7
Splatting 38.5
28% 33.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 6.4 6.8 7.9 8.7 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 70.5
Write 76.5
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 7.5
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 60%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
73GB free
Firmware: ST1OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 70 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 89.5
Write 88.5
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 69.9
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 60%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.1 8.4 8.4 9 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 107
Write 9.2
Mixed 15
SusWrite 8.6
25% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback