HP p6-2415a

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP p6-2415a (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2AE0
Memory	21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130408
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '18 at 15:07
Run Duration	322 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135 10,478 User benchmarks, average bench 48% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 59.1 1-Core 43.3 2-Core 58.3 36% 53.6 Pts	4-Core 66.9 8-Core 71.2 9% 69.1 Pts	64-Core 59.9 4% 59.9 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB CLim: 742 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	20.1% Poor	Lighting 23.9 Reflection 33.8 Parallax 26.2 20% 28 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 19.4 Splatting 24.2 22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 313GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 88 80 90 114 127 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.7% Below average	Read 242 Write 216 Mixed 202 SusWrite 103 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 11.5 44% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 136 98% 125 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 479GB free Firmware: HP16 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 37 34 39 43 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 122 Write 110 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 39.6 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 114%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 26.5 Write 21.3 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 12.7 27% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 44%
WD Elements 107C 3TB 3,265 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 390GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 11 12 12 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 20.5 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 12.1 26% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 58%
WD Elements 107C 4TB 3,603 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3.5TB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 32 29 30 36 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 66.2 Write 67.3 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 35.7 69% 52.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 60%
WD Elements 107C 4TB 3,603 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 34GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 27 26 28 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 119 Write 120 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 28.2 108% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 60%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 32 32 35 36 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 129 Write 106 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 34.9 110% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 151% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C10 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.47 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.6 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP p6-2415a

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)