Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '18 at 13:01
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 211
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 712
68% 560 Pts
64-Core 947
59% 947 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.2% Good
Lighting 80.9
Reflection 93.6
Parallax 78.7
66% 84.4 fps
MRender 77.9
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 78.6
64% 77.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 64 20 44 4.3 15 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.7% Average
Read 225
Write 103
Mixed 116
SusWrite 38
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 23.8
89% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 93
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 153
111% 140 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
70GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 114 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 57.5
Write 115
Mixed 31
SusWrite 114
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.9
350% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
209GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 34
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 35
42% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL17-17-17 D4-2400 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 95.5
42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $734
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback