Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime13 Days
Run DateNov 03 '18 at 11:18
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 117
54% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 397
38% 313 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.5.2
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 55.5
34% 42.6 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 37
29% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 265 201 221 232 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 346
Write 310
Mixed 217
SusWrite 244
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 25.9
88% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 84.8
DQ Mixed 58.5
73% 135 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 104%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
236GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 71 77 77 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 83
Write 90.4
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 73.4
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
454GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 80 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 104
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 81.5
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.7% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback