User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
19 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemRazer Razer Blade
MotherboardRAZER RAZER
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 02 '18 at 23:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 172
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 446
48% 371 Pts
64-Core 452
30% 452 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Device(1B61 2007) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 39
Parallax 62.7
13% 50.5 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 33.2
16% 43.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-256M6M 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DM80105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 350 350 307 354 353 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 427
Write 331
Mixed 240
SusWrite 345
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 28.8
101% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 180
158% 237 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback